Login or Register to make a submission.

This journal is not currently accepting submissions. Please check back in Fall 2025. 

 

The Journal of Islamic Law invites papers that explore both theoretical discussions and practical applications concerning the ḥudūd, penalties that Muslim jurists consider to be divinely ordained punishments for a Special Issue on "Moratoriums on Islamic Criminal Punishments: Legal Debates and Current Practices." With the establishment of modern Islamic states and the incorporation of ḥudūd into their legal systems, these punishments have become a cause célèbre, contributing to heightened anti-Muslim sentiment, Islamophobia, and criticism from international human rights organizations. In response, some contemporary Muslim scholars have called for the suspension of ḥudūd, presenting a range of theological, jurisprudential, and political arguments. These calls, however, face substantial resistance from traditionalists who view ḥudūd as an essential component of sharīʿa. This has resulted in a polarized debate between proponents and opponents of ḥudūd, with each side presenting consequentialist and deontological arguments. The ongoing debate between pro-and anti-ḥudūd jurists not only underscores the conflict between progressive and conservative viewpoints but also challenges the foundational socio-legal and ethical norms within diverse societies. This debate invites further arguments and reflections to uncover subtler dimensions, challenge prevailing assumptions, and contribute to a deeper understanding of the intersection between Islamic law, human rights, international relations, and the global reputation of Muslims.

This special issue calls for work that will delve into both theoretical and practical dimensions of ḥudūd suspension, offering a comprehensive examination of this complex issue. Thematically, we invite papers that explore juristic and theological arguments related to the suspension of ḥudūd punishments, including interpretations of the Qur’ān and ḥadīth, as well as the theoretical and practical challenges that impede the suspension of ḥudūd across various jurisdictions. Papers offering real-world examples of the implementation or suspension of ḥudūd laws in countries such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Malaysia, and other relevant states are particularly welcome. Submissions are also encouraged to address the broader implications of these legal practices, including their impact on social and political dynamics, and their influence on international perceptions of Islamic law. We encourage discussions that incorporate a diverse array of perspectives—legal, political, and sociological—to elucidate the complexities and challenges of navigating ḥudūd laws in today’s global context. By integrating these varied viewpoints, we aim to foster a nuanced understanding of the ongoing debates and practical realities surrounding ḥudūd suspension.

We seek articles of up to 15,000 words for the Journal of Islamic Law, and essays of up to 5,000 words for the Journal of Islamic Law Online Forum. Submissions for this year’s special issue are due by January 13, 2025, and must be submitted through either Scholastica or our online submissions portal. Once accepted, the paper goes through a process of peer review, a final decision on acceptance, editing, and publication. This special issue of the Journal of Islamic Law is edited by Bahman Khodadadi (skhodadadi@law.harvard.edu), research fellow at Harvard Law School’s Program in Islamic Law, and will be published in April 2025. For detailed submission guidelines, please visit our submissions webpage. For further questions, please contact us at pil@law.harvard.edu.

 

We accept submissions via Scholastica or through our online submissions portal

The Journal of Islamic Law welcomes scholarship in Islamic law for its main publication as well as for its dynamic Forum designed to feature scholarly responses, debates, or new developments in Islamic law scholarship or at the intersection of Islamic law and data science. Submissions, unless otherwise noted for special issues, may take many forms, including: Articles & Essays, Student Notes, and Book/Tech Reviews. Both single-author and co-authored submissions are welcome.

 

Articles & Essays

Articles present sustained works of original research on some aspect of Islamic or comparative law; essays are usually narrower in scope. While the line between them is not rigid, we recommend that article submissions have fewer than 12,500 words, including footnotes. We publish two types of essays: (1) Journal essays, which have fewer than 5,000 words, including footnotes; and (2) Blog essays, which have fewer than 2,000 words, including footnotes. Blog essays may be considered for publication in the Journal at the editors’ discretion.

Both articles and essays may explore traditional topics in Islamic law or engage with its intersection with AI and data science. Empirical elements like datasets, links, or statistical appendices may be included in AI/data science submissions and do not count toward the word limit.

 

Student Notes

Notes are student-written works typically available to Harvard students. Notes submissions should have fewer than 5,000 words, including footnotes. Like articles and essays, student notes may focus on Islamic law or its intersection with AI/data science. Empirical components such as datasets and statistical evidence are welcome and do not count toward the word limit.

 

Book/Tech Reviews

We accept reviews of books published within the last two years and tech reviews of AI or data science tools relevant to Islamic law research. Reviews should be under 2,000 words, including footnotes. Empirical components, such as datasets and appendices, may also be included and are not counted in the word limit.

 

Formatting

Footnotes should conform to the latest edition of the Bluebook (i.e., no need for a separate bibliography). Submissions should be single spaced and in Times New Roman, font size 12.  Submissions should include a paragraph of not more than 500 words. Submissions should list between 3 and 5 key words.

 

 

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.